Skip to main content

The Party of Fiscal Conservatism

A chart at James Fallows' blog:


Now: Maybe the current crop of Republicans will end up walking the walk they've only ever talked. History doesn't bode well.

Comments

Andrew said…
Per your little chart from November, I've only a couple of things to say: you've got to be kidding me. How can you attempt to persuade an argument with partial facts? You seem to be using a little micro alongside macro economics to prove some kind of point without including the rest of the pertinent information. Where is the change in revenues associated with the change of debt, or how about the change in spending per capita alongside changes in debt per capita. And let's also look at where funding is started. Read your handy-dandy constitution. It starts in the House of Representatives. Surely you remember during the Reagan years, Tip O'Neil and his overwhelming Democrat-run Congress. We can't forget that the dems have been running Congress since before Truman. I noticed you didn't go back to Roosevelt. Why did you stop at Truman? Could it be due to the fact that the New Deal and New Dealer's more than did their fair share of increasing the debt more than 3 times the levels that put us in the Great Depression? Probably not though. Maybe you and most of your groupies are unaware a historical facts. Remember, you're allowed to have your own opinion, just not your own facts.

Just another little tidbit for your chart. Look at Clinton's era, and notice, that was the Republican Revolution which wasn't as great a take-over as that happened this last November. I wonder if you'll add your Messiah to this list in a couple of years and have a nice negative green number beside his name too.

This is just a rant. It's not meant to be a complete argument. I won't use unassociated numbers to back up my argument.

Popular posts from this blog

Yoga

I've been making some life changes lately — trying to use the time I have, now that I'm back in Kansas, to improve my health and lifestyle. Among the changes: More exercise. 30 minutes a day on the treadmill. Doesn't sound like a lot, but some is more than none, and I know from experience that getting overambitious early leads to failure. So. Thirty minutes a day.

One other thing: Yoga, a couple of times a week. It's nothing huge — a 15-minute flexibility routine downloaded from an iPhone app. But I've noticed that I'm increasingly limber.

Tonight, friends, I noticed a piece of trash on the floor. I bent over at the waist and picked it up, and threw it away.

Then I wept. I literally could not remember the last time I'd tried to pick something off the floor without grunting and bracing myself. I just did it.

Small victories, people. Small victories.

Liberals: We're overthinking this. Hillary didn't lose. This is what it should mean.

Interesting:
Nate Cohn of the New York Times estimates that when every vote is tallied, some 63.4 million Americans will have voted for Clinton and 61.2 million for Trump. That means Clinton will have turned out more supporters than any presidential candidate in history except for Obama in 2008 and 2012. And as David Wasserman of Cook Political Report notes, the total vote count—including third party votes—has already crossed 127 million, and will “easily beat” the 129 million total from 2012. The idea that voters stayed home in 2016 because they hated Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton is a myth. We already know the Electoral College can produce undemocratic results, but what we don't know is why — aside from how it serves entrenched interests — it benefits the American people to have their preference for national executive overturned because of archaic rules designed, in part, to protect the institution of slavery. 

A form of choosing the national leader that — as has happened in …

I'm not cutting off my pro-Trump friends

Here and there on Facebook, I've seen a few of my friends declare they no longer wish the friendship of Trump supporters — and vowing to cut them out of their social media lives entirely.

I'm not going to do that.

To cut ourselves off from people who have made what we think was a grievous error in their vote is to give up on persuading them, to give up on understanding why they voted, to give up on understanding them in any but the most cartoonish stereotypes.

As a matter of idealism, cutting off your pro-Trump friends is to give up on democracy. As a matter of tactics, cutting off your pro-Trump friends is to give up on ever again winning in a democratic process.

And as a long-term issues, confining ourselves to echo chambers is part of our national problem.

Don't get me wrong: I expect a Trumpian presidency is a disaster, particularly for people of color. And in total honesty: My own relationships have been tested by this campaign season. There's probably some damage…