Joel Mathis

The latest talking point from the White House and its allies is that President Trump’s Muslim ban isn’t a Muslim ban. There are lots of countries with Muslim populations that aren’t targeted by the ban, after all. So what’s the big deal. So how do we know the Muslim ban is a Muslim ban? Because President Trump and his allies have told us so . This is what Trump called for during the campaign: Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump called Monday for barring all Muslims from entering the United States.  "Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on," a campaign press release said. Rudy told us how the administration maneuvered to make the ban legal: "He called me up, he said, ‘Put a commission together, show me the right way to do it legally.’"  Giuliani said he then put together a commission that included lawmakers and expert

Matt Welch points out a fact that's lost in most of the coverage I've seen: The far-reaching order, which marks a sharp reversal of decades' worth of American policy, also slashed the annual target for the number of refugees accepted to 50,000, down from the original 110,000 for fiscal 2017 set by Barack Obama, and from the 85,000 refugees accepted in fiscal 2016. (The Obama administration consistently admitted around 75,000 refugees per year ; only George W. Bush was stingier over the past 40 years.) In other words: We're not just shutting down Muslim immigration. We're closing the door to people fleeing war, poverty, and oppression everywhere. Last one out, turn out the lights at the Statue of Liberty.

If you call yourself Christian and you're OK with Trump working to save Syrian Christians while banning Syrians of other religions, then Christianity is not your faith, it is not your religion, and it's certainly not your relationship with Jesus. It's just a tribe. Just a way of dividing us from them. Little could be more profane.

I've spent a decade offering my opinions in public forums, but I don't feel quite equal to this moment. Some of this is sheer flood of outrages — I'm just comprehending one when the next comes along. Which feels like my insights about the Trump Era are often limited to: This is wrong. This is wrong. This is wrong. This is wrong. So let's be clear: It's not wrong to want to vet refugees, with a high degree of confidence but also within reason, to try to ensure they won't be a threat to their neighbors in the U.S. We have every right to expect the government will do so. But to say "no" to refugees entirely — without any effort to separate the wheat from the chaff, but to assign a collective punishment to people already fleeing danger — is not the mark of a great nation. It is a cowardly act. Cowardly. I am ashamed of what my government is doing today. This is wrong. This is wrong. This is wrong.