I love the Godfather pictures -- I'm a middle-aged white guy, and I've only recently come to realize how much that makes me a cliche -- and my dirty secret is I don't think Part III is actually that bad.
Don't get me wrong: Pacino is way over the top in this movie. I would love to know how the silent Michael Corleone of the 1950s became the shouty guy of the late 1970s, but I suspect that's more a Pacino thing than a story thing.
That said, it has all the elements of a potentially great Part III:
* A young up-and-comer who wants to carry on the family legacy, even though...
* A young up-and-comer who wants to carry on the family legacy, even though...
* The king, who turned to a life of crime to protect his family, wants to get out of crime...
* ...and ends up sacrificing his family, the people he loves, because of the choices he made throughout his life.
It's a tragedy, man. And the end -- Corleone's death, set to Cavlleria Rusticana -- is wonderful. No assassination. Just death, coming for the king as it comes for us all:
It's a tragedy, man. And the end -- Corleone's death, set to Cavlleria Rusticana -- is wonderful. No assassination. Just death, coming for the king as it comes for us all:
No comments:
Post a Comment