Skip to main content

Wait. The Republicans Didn't Run on Cutting Social Security Did They?

Because that's the Republican agenda now that the election is over. Eric Cantor writes his fellow Republicans:

"Getting our long-term deficit under control will require that we address major entitlement reform.� It is a conversation that we must have, but one that is easier said than done. President Obama, congressional Democrats, and their liberal allies have made it abundantly clear that they will attack anyone who puts forward a plan that even tries to begin a conversation about the tough choices that are needed."

Entitlements being, of course, Social Security and Medicare. The Economist and Kevin Drum point out that Republicans spent the campaign season savaging Dems for reining in Medicare in the health bill -- but now that the election's over, things have changed.

My problem isn't the hypocrisy -- well, ok, my problem is partly the hypocrisy. Instead, I hate it when people run for office with big plans they don't tell the public about. That's deceiving the voters -- if only by omission -- and it's a lousy way to make a democracy. One reason George W. Bush started sinking so quickly after the 2004 election isn't just that he tried to privatize Social Security; it's that he didn't raise it as an issue until after the election was over. It's bait-and-switch, and it shouldn't be rewarded.


Rick Henderson said…
Explain "cutting Social Security." If Cantor means changing the formula for calculating COLAs -- which is at a rate that's much more generous than CPI -- that's not cutting Social Security. It's reducing the rate of growth of benefits. (This is a reform that's been backed by a number of Democrats over the years, by the way.)

Besides, Joel, you say Republicans talk a good game about genuine spending cuts but never offer any. Now they might be, and you savage them.

The hypocrisy bothers me a little, too.
Joel said…
Rick: Where's the hypocrisy on my part? I'm not savaging the Republicans for offering some details, finally. I'm "savaging" them for waiting until after the election to offer details when these details were clearly in the cards all along.

Or do you think Eric Cantor just came up with this plan in the last three days?
Rick Henderson said…
Paul Ryan's "roadmap" includes plans to make some significant changes (including some genuine cuts) to entitlements, and while not all Republicans embraced it, it wasn't as if Ryan was ashamed of it. And Cantor is widely seen as an ally of Ryan.

So I have no idea why you seem so surprised by all this.

I see this ad run by incumbent N.C. Democrat Mike McIntyre, who barely won his bid for re-election, with a message that's been echoed in other Democratic districts, much more hypocritical.

After all, even the most radical Social Security reforms proposed by major party candidates would not touch benefits for current retirees. This commercial doesn't mention that.
Rick Henderson said…
Besides, it's not as if House Republicans can implement their reforms unilaterally. Last I checked, Democrats still control the Senate. And Obama has his veto pen.

A little decaf, perhaps?

Popular posts from this blog


I've been making some life changes lately — trying to use the time I have, now that I'm back in Kansas, to improve my health and lifestyle. Among the changes: More exercise. 30 minutes a day on the treadmill. Doesn't sound like a lot, but some is more than none, and I know from experience that getting overambitious early leads to failure. So. Thirty minutes a day.

One other thing: Yoga, a couple of times a week. It's nothing huge — a 15-minute flexibility routine downloaded from an iPhone app. But I've noticed that I'm increasingly limber.

Tonight, friends, I noticed a piece of trash on the floor. I bent over at the waist and picked it up, and threw it away.

Then I wept. I literally could not remember the last time I'd tried to pick something off the floor without grunting and bracing myself. I just did it.

Small victories, people. Small victories.

Liberals: We're overthinking this. Hillary didn't lose. This is what it should mean.

Nate Cohn of the New York Times estimates that when every vote is tallied, some 63.4 million Americans will have voted for Clinton and 61.2 million for Trump. That means Clinton will have turned out more supporters than any presidential candidate in history except for Obama in 2008 and 2012. And as David Wasserman of Cook Political Report notes, the total vote count—including third party votes—has already crossed 127 million, and will “easily beat” the 129 million total from 2012. The idea that voters stayed home in 2016 because they hated Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton is a myth. We already know the Electoral College can produce undemocratic results, but what we don't know is why — aside from how it serves entrenched interests — it benefits the American people to have their preference for national executive overturned because of archaic rules designed, in part, to protect the institution of slavery. 

A form of choosing the national leader that — as has happened in …

I'm not cutting off my pro-Trump friends

Here and there on Facebook, I've seen a few of my friends declare they no longer wish the friendship of Trump supporters — and vowing to cut them out of their social media lives entirely.

I'm not going to do that.

To cut ourselves off from people who have made what we think was a grievous error in their vote is to give up on persuading them, to give up on understanding why they voted, to give up on understanding them in any but the most cartoonish stereotypes.

As a matter of idealism, cutting off your pro-Trump friends is to give up on democracy. As a matter of tactics, cutting off your pro-Trump friends is to give up on ever again winning in a democratic process.

And as a long-term issues, confining ourselves to echo chambers is part of our national problem.

Don't get me wrong: I expect a Trumpian presidency is a disaster, particularly for people of color. And in total honesty: My own relationships have been tested by this campaign season. There's probably some damage…