Skip to main content

Obama Should Hold Steady on Bush Tax Cuts

This seems right to me:

"In his weekly address Saturday, Obama said that Democrats and Republicans not only agree on middle-class tax cuts but the need to rein in spending, and used this to try to drive his position on the tax cuts.

'At a time when we are going to ask folks across the board to make such difficult sacrifices, I don’t see how we can afford to borrow an additional $700 billion from other countries to make all the Bush tax cuts permanent, even for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans,' the president said. 'We’d be digging ourselves into an even deeper fiscal hole and passing the burden on to our children.'"


This seems worth fighting for. The tax cuts are better targeted at the middle class than the rich, even in a down economy, because the middle class will spend the money, doing their part to at least keep growth from bottoming out entirely. Couples making more than $250,000 -- yes, that's rich -- are more likely to save the extra dough. That's a virtue, but it's not the virtue their country needs right now.

And as politics: If Republicans want to hold a tax cut for the middle class hostage to a tax cut for the rich, let 'em. I'm certain voters will be paying attention.

Comments

DOTDOT said…
Saving money is a virtue our country doesn't need right now? Is that what this is all about? The only people that can afford to save money are in the 250+ bracket, and I say power to 'em. These tax "cuts" are smoke and mirrors. This is not an entitlement proffered to 250k+ households. This is THEIR MONEY. The prospect of success is a driving force in our economy. Penalizing success, no matter how it plays among the entitled masses, contributes to a downward spiral that actually increases the numbers of the entitled masses.

Good God. Is this the issue that drives me into the arms of the Republicans?
Joel said…
DotDot: Hmmm. Maybe I didn't explain myself so well.

You're right. Saving is good. But we need people to be spending money right now. Money being spent makes increases demand. More demand means more jobs. I don't encourage people to spend on credit - lord no - but I do encourage people to use 'their own money' to spend.

That's more likely to happen with tax cuts for the middle class than for people with more money. Our economy will be helped more by middle class people spending than by rich people saving.

At the same time, our government is spending more than it's taking in. The Republicans will tell you that can be balanced by spending cuts alone, but ... well, your own mileage may vary on that. Suffice it to say, if we're going to balance the budget, I don't think that returning marginal tax rates to Clinton-era rates is unduly oppressive, and it hurts the day-to-day spending of couples making $250,000 much much less than couples making less than that.

You're right. It's their money. So is the first cent of tax collected. I'm not arguing to return to Eisenhower-era tax rates, just Clinton-era tax rates. Unless you're a libertarian who objects to taxes at all on principle, this doesn't seem like a big deal to me.

Popular posts from this blog

Yoga

I've been making some life changes lately — trying to use the time I have, now that I'm back in Kansas, to improve my health and lifestyle. Among the changes: More exercise. 30 minutes a day on the treadmill. Doesn't sound like a lot, but some is more than none, and I know from experience that getting overambitious early leads to failure. So. Thirty minutes a day.

One other thing: Yoga, a couple of times a week. It's nothing huge — a 15-minute flexibility routine downloaded from an iPhone app. But I've noticed that I'm increasingly limber.

Tonight, friends, I noticed a piece of trash on the floor. I bent over at the waist and picked it up, and threw it away.

Then I wept. I literally could not remember the last time I'd tried to pick something off the floor without grunting and bracing myself. I just did it.

Small victories, people. Small victories.

Liberals: We're overthinking this. Hillary didn't lose. This is what it should mean.

Interesting:
Nate Cohn of the New York Times estimates that when every vote is tallied, some 63.4 million Americans will have voted for Clinton and 61.2 million for Trump. That means Clinton will have turned out more supporters than any presidential candidate in history except for Obama in 2008 and 2012. And as David Wasserman of Cook Political Report notes, the total vote count—including third party votes—has already crossed 127 million, and will “easily beat” the 129 million total from 2012. The idea that voters stayed home in 2016 because they hated Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton is a myth. We already know the Electoral College can produce undemocratic results, but what we don't know is why — aside from how it serves entrenched interests — it benefits the American people to have their preference for national executive overturned because of archaic rules designed, in part, to protect the institution of slavery. 

A form of choosing the national leader that — as has happened in …

I'm not cutting off my pro-Trump friends

Here and there on Facebook, I've seen a few of my friends declare they no longer wish the friendship of Trump supporters — and vowing to cut them out of their social media lives entirely.

I'm not going to do that.

To cut ourselves off from people who have made what we think was a grievous error in their vote is to give up on persuading them, to give up on understanding why they voted, to give up on understanding them in any but the most cartoonish stereotypes.

As a matter of idealism, cutting off your pro-Trump friends is to give up on democracy. As a matter of tactics, cutting off your pro-Trump friends is to give up on ever again winning in a democratic process.

And as a long-term issues, confining ourselves to echo chambers is part of our national problem.

Don't get me wrong: I expect a Trumpian presidency is a disaster, particularly for people of color. And in total honesty: My own relationships have been tested by this campaign season. There's probably some damage…