 |
| Photo by Miguel Á. Padriñán from Pexels |
What we have on our nation's southern border is no less than an invasion. An invasion of people trying to enter this country illegally--i.e., against the law. And who makes the laws of this country? You know good and well--Congress. So, we obey the laws that exist and if Congress wants something else, than they should DO THEIR JOBS.
Attila the Hun invaded Western Europe with fewer people and this nation cannot let its borders and sovereignty be disregarded as being done by these modern day invaders.
There's more, but you get the idea.
My response, in part:
I thank you for your letter, but I must strenuously disagree with your use of the word "invasion." As a member of the military, you surely know better.
If war is politics by other means, than an invasion is pointedly and purposefully political: A concerted attempt to commandeer the rule of people and land from the current owners.
The current wave of migration we see is no such thing. People and their families are fleeing poverty and violence in order to pursue better lives. They seem willing to work for that chance at improvement; I see no evidence they are trying to usurp American self-government, that they're trying to take property that isn't theirs, or even that they're really all that organized, "caravans" notwithstanding.
If you found your family threatened by violence, and yourself unable to financially support them, I daresay you might try to move to someplace you could. You would not be invading that new place.
Anti-immigration activists try to treat migration in militaristic terms, as invaders. Actually, they more closely resemble the pilgrims whose migration to America planted the seeds for the holiday we collectively celebrate tomorrow. That's no invasion.
